Effects of using wastewater on vegetable growing and the associated socio-economic impacts on farmers in the Kafue Lagoon Areas and along Ngwerere River
(Draft
final report) ByCharles
Bwalya Chisanga and Oscar
Musweu Silembo
Report
PMA 14;September
2004
Ministry of Finance and
National Planning Zambia Social Investment Fund
Executive Summary
This
report is an out from Poverty Monitoring Analysis (PMA) under the Zambia Social
Investment Fund (Zamsif). The aim of the study was to assess the Effects of
using wastewater on vegetable growing and the associated socio-economic impacts
on farmers in the Kafue Lagoon Areas and along Ngwerere River. The research is
based on field studies carried out in Kafue Lagoon and in the Ngwerere
sub-catchment.
In urban and peri-urban areas in developing countries such as
Zambia, poor farmers commonly use wastewater to irrigate high-value crops. In
many places the pre-treated or untreated wastewater is their only source of
irrigation water—so their livelihoods depend on it. But, as well as bringing
benefits, the unregulated use of wastewater or nutrient enriched water also
poses risks to human health and the environment. Wastewater
irrigation can also significantly contribute to household and urban food
security and nutrition. Recent studies
conducted in several Asian and African cities have revealed that wastewater
agriculture has accounted for over 50% of urban vegetable supply. Wastewater is
used as a source of irrigation water as well as a source of plant nutrients and
trace elements allowing farmers to reduce or even eliminate the purchase of
fertilisers. One tenth or more of the world’s population currently eats food
produced on wastewater but not always in a safe way.
The
sources of wastewater are made up of domestic wastewater, industrial
wastewater, storm-water and groundwater seepage entering municipal sewage
network. Domestic wastewater is made up of effluent discharge from household,
institutions, and commercial buildings. Industrial wastewater is the effluent
discharged by manufacturing plants. Wastewater is composed of organic matter,
nutrients, inorganic matter, toxic chemicals and pathogens. In many place the
wastewater is discharged into water bodies or the environment treated or
pre-treated or as raw sewage.
The
study was carried out in two phases within a period of two months.
Ø
Document
review on wastewater reuse
Ø
The
samples were tested for microbiological (total coliform, E. coli and
faecal streptococci), physicochemical and heavy metals quality parameters,
plant and riverbed sediment samples were also collected and tested for heavy
metals. The plants and sediment analysis were for exploratory purposes.
Ø
Questionnaire
formulation and administering in Ngwerere River and Kafue Lagoon Areas.
Questionnaires were analysed using excel, graphs and figures.
Literature review
Westcot
(1997) makes a distinction between direct and in-direct reuse. Direct reuse is
the planned use of raw or treated wastewater, where control exits over the
conveyance of wastewater from the point of collection or discharge from a
treatment plant to a controlled area where it is used for irrigation. This is
the situation in many developed nations. Indirect reuse is the situation found
in many developing national like Zambia where municipal and industrial
wastewater is discharged without treatment or monitoring into the watercourses
draining an urban area. There is no control over the use of water for
irrigation.
Microbiological contamination: The WHO guidelines provide a
limit for permissible levels of microbiological contamination in water. Westcot
(1997) addresses the question how the WHO guidelines can be applied where
farmers are irrigating using water from rivers downstream of large urban
centres. He suggests that in the absence of better information it is prudent to
use the WHO standard for faecal coliforms as the quality standard. He also
suggests establishing a routine water quality-monitoring programme, based on
faecal coliforms number to support certification programme for high risk or
restricted crops. This requires education of consumers and encouraging market
forces whereby consumers chose to buy certified produce. It is argued that this
approach is more realistic than attempting to impose crop restrictions which
also almost impossible to enforce. The wastewater can be used for unrestricted
irrigation of crops such as lettuce, salads and cucumbers grown for direct
human consumption and eaten raw and for restricted irrigation of crops not
intended for direct human consumption such as cotton, sisal, wheat and
sunflower. The criteria for unrestricted irrigation
contain the same helminthes criteria for restricted irrigation, in addition to
a restriction of £1000 faecal coliforms per 100ml treated effluents. Restricted
irrigation refers to the irrigation of crops not intended for direct human
consumption and there should be £1 human intestinal
nematode egg per liter implying a greater than 99% treatment level. Reuse of (pre) treated
wastewater, especially in agriculture, could considerably contribute to water
resources conservation, recycling of nutrients and prevention of surface water
pollution. Water quality guidelines are necessary for wastewater irrigation,
but they are rather strict and developing countries cannot afford the expensive
treatment.
Trace elements and heavy metals: It is widely accepted that
levels of trace elements and heavy metals in irrigation water are likely to be
toxic to plants in concentration below that which may pose a profound risk to
human health and provides a degree of natural protection to irrigators. This
study focused on heavy metal in the water, plant tissue and sediments. The
findings indicate that the heavy metals in water were below the detection
limit. Some of the heavy metals were found in the plants such as lead, zinc and
cadmium. Copper and mercury were not detected in both the water column and
plant tissues. Compared with the thresholds for plants the heavy metals in
plants are below the limits, which may be harm to human health.
Farmer characteristics
Gender
In Kafue
Lagoon area, 60% of the peasant farmers using wastewater are women and 40% are
men. By contrast the majority of the farmers in Ngwerere area are men (81%) and
19% are women.
Age
The average
age of farmers in Kafue Lagoon areas is 35 years whist in the Ngwerere is 30
years. Most farmers engaged in farming in the Ngwerere don’t stay near the
river and others rent the plots and pay K60, 000 after six (6) months. In the
Lagoon areas farmers don’t pay any thing for farming within the area.
Other
occupation
The main
occupation of farmers in Kafue Lagoon area is farming and gardening (100%)
since all of the respondents interviewed are unemployed. In the Ngwerere area
the main occupation of the farmers are also gardening and farming which is 77%.
Land
tenure
The land
tenure in Ngwerere River Area is communal, leasehold, farmer own land and
Zambia National Services. In the Kafue Lagoon areas the land tenure is
freehold, effluent discharge area for Lee Yeast, Nitrogen Chemicals of Zambia
and Shikoswe stream before the effluents
enter the Kafue River.
Irrigation
water management
The sources
of irrigation water for farmers in the Kafue Lagoon areas are the Shikoswe
stream, Nitrogen Chemicals of Zambia and Lee Yeast effluent discharge canals.
In the Ngwerere sub-catchment the sources of water is a permanent stream
running within the catchment.
The
most common method used by farmers (100%) in the Lagoon areas to irrigate their
field crops is by using containers or buckets
(10 to 20 litre containers). Even though this is a labour intensive
method, some farmers are able to apply nearly to the entire field. The
respondents interviewed in Ngwerere River area irrigate their crops manually
using bucket/watering can (10 to 20 litre containers) (93%) and 7% of the
respondents use pumps to convey the water from the river channel on to their
crop fields.
Cropping
practices and yields
The size of
land preparation varies greatly between sites. The average plot size for the
surveyed farms (small-scale peasant farmers) in Ngwerere area is 0.25 ha and
ranges from 0.1 ha to 0.5 ha whilst in Kafue Lagoon is 1.2 ha and ranges from
0.25 ha to 2 ha respectively. The mostly widely grown crops vary within the
study areas. Rape and chinese cabbage are the most common grown crops in both
areas. In addition to Kafue Lagoon areas farmers also grow sugar canes, which
are sold in Lusaka, Chirundu and other areas. In the Ngwerere a large variety
of other crops are grown in addition to rape and chinese cabbage. The average
income realised from the sale of the produce in both areas vary tremendously.
In the Lagoon areas the average incomer per year varies from K 800, 000 to K1,
000, 000 and in the Ngwerere is K800, 000 to K2, 400, 000. There appear to be a
clear need for extension services to growers along side with improving the
water quality.
Marketing
The
single most common means of marketing the produce by farmers is to take their
products to the markets. Farmers from the Ngwerere area sale their produce
individually at Soweto, Town Centre, Kabanana, Chipata Compund, Ngombe,
Katabalala, Chaisa, Garden, and Kaunda Square markets. The crops are marketed
individually (83%) or as a formal group (12%) or traders (3%) buy the produce
from the farmers, which they later sell.
The single
most common means by farmers to market their produce in the Kafue Lagoon is for
growers to sale their produce as individuals and this is at 100%. Individual
farmers market the produce of the Kafue Lagoon by taking them to the markets.
There are sold in different parts of Kafue and Lusaka including Chirundu.
Public
health
The diseases, which are prevalent in the two study areas, are malaria,
bilharzias and diarrhoea. For the Ngwerere area, secondary data obtained at
Kasisi Rural Health Centre helped to confirm the findings
Water
quality:
Plant
analysis: heavy metals were not detected in
mercury and copper. Lead, zinc and cadmium were detected. Compared with the
threshold values the value for lead, zinc and cadmium do not pose any risk to
human health.
Physicochemical parameters: For Ngwerere river area the
physicochemical results were within the limits of the ECZ, WHO, DWA and EU
guidelines for water quality. However, the pH was higher than the recommended
upper limit of 9 in some cases. Ammonia levels at N1 and N2 (that is urban and
peri-urban areas) was higher than the WHO drinking water guideline value of
0.5mg/l. On average sodium was higher than the guideline value of 200mg/l which
can lead to the problem of specific ion toxicity and salinity problems. Total
suspended solids (TSS) at N1 and N3 were also higher than the ECZ guideline
value of 100mg/l.
The
conductivity, phosphorus and calcium levels at Lee Yeast sampling point were
higher than the recommended standard by ECZ. High calcium and conductivity
levels were also reported by Sinkala et al (1996). The source of the
calcium is mainly the geology of the area. The high conductivity corresponds to
high sodium content of the effluent.
All
the other parameters measured were lower than the recommended maximum
concentration in irrigation water, according to Pescod (1997). The
concentration of heavy metals and boron in the water at all the sampling points
were below the detection limit of the method of analysis which is also far
below the recommended maximum concentrations
Sediments: Two
samples were collected on different days at both sites. After about a week,
there was a high increase in the concentration of Zn, Fe, Pb and Cu at the
first two sites (N1 and N2) on the Ngwerere River. At Kafue lagoon, there was
also an increase in the heavy metal content after 12 days at the Shikoswe
stream site, also indicating a relatively high rate of deposition. The results
from the sediments samples during the study period were compared with the
standards in the Netherlands.
Microbiological: For Ngwerere River only the
last point (N3 about 23 km from source) qualifies for unrestricted irrigation
according to the WHO guideline value of £1000 faecal coliform/100ml. Under unrestricted
irrigation vegetables and salad crops can be grown using water with £1000 faecal coliform/100ml.
Therefore, the growing of vegetables at the other sites (N1 and N2) poses a
health risk to workers (or producers) and the consumers due to high levels of
faecal coliforms.
Kafue
Lagoon Areas, the Shikoswe and Lee Yeast effluent streams the values for faecal
coliforms were above the WHO guideline of £1000 faecal coliforms/100ml
Summary
of the conclusions.
Ø
The
WHO guidelines for microbiological quality of wastewater use/or reuse for
irrigation are intended as a guide for the design of treatment plants
Ø
There
is no evidence of pollution with heavy metals that may pose a threat to
irrigated crops
Ø
Farmers
are irrigating their crops using the water in the Ngwerere River and Kafue
Lagoon Areas as a means of earning a living
Ø
All
the respondents interviewed in the Lagoons are unemployed while 87% of the respondents
in Ngwerere are unemployed
Ø
Water
salinity may pose a threat to crop production in both areas
Ø
There
is also need to embark on an education programme for farmers and the public
Using
the WHO guidelines only restricted irrigation can be practiced
The recent technological advances have come to a point where the possible negative health effects of „exposure to chemical contaminants and disease-causing microbes from waste water reuse do not exceed, and in some cases may be significantly lower than, the risks of existing water supplies.“ Sampling Waste Water
ReplyDeleteThanks Mayers
ReplyDelete